veraville

The rats … created, through running, a brain that seemed biochemically, molecularly, calm.

Phys Ed: Why Exercise Makes You Less Anxious - Well Blog - NYTimes.com

I’m willing to test this theory.

We bought a vacuum. Its name is Jill. Seriously, on the side of the box in white cursive beneath the brand and model number is written, ‘Jill.’ Also, she’s hot pink.

…even the most conventional account of our literary “canon” reveals the history of the novel to be simultaneously a history of nonconformity. For as readers we have loved and celebrated not some hazy general idea of the novel but rather the peculiar works of individual imaginations. Even in those familiar lists of “great novels”, classics of the genre, and so on, it’s hard to find a single “well-made” novel among them, if by well-made we mean something like “evenly shaped, regular, predictable and elegantly designed”. Is War and Peace, with its huge tracts of undigested essay, absurd plotting and obscene length, a well-made novel? Is The Trial? And those neat Victorian novels we’re now expected casually to revile – is it not only from a distance, and in the memory, that they look as neat as they do? Which of them is truly “well made”? Jane Eyre seemed hysterical and lopsided to its earliest readers; we now think of Middlemarch as the ultimate “proper” novel, forgetting how eccentric and strange it looked on publication, with its unwieldy and unfeminine scientific preoccupations and moral structure borrowed from Spinoza. In our classic novels there always remains something odd, unruly, as distinctly weird as Hardy’s Little Father Time. Novels that don’t look like novels? When it comes to the canon – to steal a line from Lorrie Moore – novels like that are the only novels here.

Zadie Smith on the rise of the essay | Books | The Guardian

In a new book, David Shields argues for the rough, raw “truthiness” of the essay over fiction. But Smith finds that many of our classic novels can be ascribed the same qualities.


Doors interview, 1969.

maura:

agrammar:

The same thing held for print music magazines, which didn’t come with “back” buttons: stuck on a bus with a copy of one, you’d be a lot more likely to read about the genres and bands you didn’t like. Not just out of boredom, but to have a better idea of what surrounded the stuff you did like — what other people were listening to, or the ways they talked about it, or just what kinds of sub-trends and mediocrities and bad ideas were floating around your preferred genre, and what interesting conclusions might be drawn from them.

Not to mention that the way a reader’s eye travels around a page, and past pages that can be stopped at and browsed even if they weren’t the thing that the reader was turning pages to get to, results in an experience that’s very different than the point-and-click-a-headline method for selecting reading material online. That increased opportunity for serendipitous intake is crucial, especially since it allows people to find out about topics — whether they be cultural or political or both or something else entirely — that they wouldn’t necessarily make the effort to seek out on their own.

I’d argue that the Web allows for many “opportunit[ies] for serendipitous intake,” but you know, “intake” may be too generous a word. We’re not really taking it in online. We’re taking. That’s about it.

Still, I am happy to report that Tumblr in particular is doing something excellent for my reading comprehension skills.

It’s like an intellectual-emotional slumb(e)r party around here.

“…most of us will, for instance, read just as much about politicians we can’t vote for (or against) as we will for our actual representatives. Because, well: we want to know what’s going on. The same thing held for print music magazines, which didn’t come with “back” buttons: stuck on a bus with a copy of one, you’d be a lot more likely to read about the genres and bands you didn’t like. Not just out of boredom, but to have a better idea of what surrounded the stuff you did like — what other people were listening to, or the ways they talked about it, or just what kinds of sub-trends and mediocrities and bad ideas were floating around your preferred genre, and what interesting conclusions might be drawn from them.

All this is just an attempt to argue the obvious: that reading a couple interesting things about music you don’t want to hear can be useful and actually even fun. It can even, in the end, make you more efficient at figuring out what you do want to hear — you might wind up with a better perspective on the territory, rather than just a laser focus on acquiring things that are already to your tastes. You might wind up with better ideas and tools for thinking about stuff. Or, yes, maybe you’ll just read a review of something you don’t care for but browse away thinking “oh, that was an interesting idea in there about X.”


agrammar
Wondering if the people that he was supposed to be connecting with/sharing life with were ultimately the same ppl who forced him to metaphorically ‘off himself.’ Worried that if Edward Droste isn’t there to ‘officially endorse’ buzzbands, many of the world’s top music bloggers won’t know what they are supposed 2 like. Have heard that Neon Indian only got ‘mainstream indie’ acceptance’ after Ed Droste endorsed the buzzband on his twitter.

Are authentic alternative celebrities scaling back their internet presences?

Great commentary from Hipsterrunoff about the seemingly inane but probably ramificatory [sic] departure of Edward Droste, lead singer of Grizzly Bear, from Twitter.

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

The Streets - “It’s Too Late”
Original Pirate Material, 2002

I was all but born in London, but when I lived there I often felt anything but English. One of my first loves was a British fellow named Jack. We met at a summer job, and as these things go, our love faded with the season. I went to an American school that he knew of well because it stuck out like a sore thumb. He went to a very reputable boys’ school that I knew well because I almost went to the girls’ equivalent. (Instead, after sitting through grueling placement exam for U.K. secondary school, my family was shipped off to Cyprus. We returned to London when I was in eighth grade, but by then it was apparently too late to switch to the British school system.)

Jack and I used to take walks on Parliament Hill Fields, where Plath and Hughes used to hang out and where I occasionally set cross-country records but more often got schooled by British runners. Jack and I were affectionate but conversationally, we were forever missing each other. It was one of those young, self-conscious relationships where all you talk about is the relationship. We’d sit on a bench at the top of the field. It was always damp. Our hands were always cold. The colder it got the more dismal our chances looked. Looking down in silence on the playground, the track and the empty pool at the bottom of the fields, I’d look for words to help me ingratiate myself with him. While I might sound like a repressed British person, I was really just young. And most of the time all he wanted was a kiss.

But we both loved dancing. We’d go to Buzz Bar, one of few clubs that under-18s could get into with fake IDs, though it wasn’t entirely a club because it closed at 12. My best friend and I would smoke and drink apple-flavored vodka. Jack and my friend’s boyfriend would drink pints. We’d be dancing and singing along to Craig David or Artful Dodger. In that context, we were all British. But eventually, Jack went for some girl at the sister school I almost attended, and I went for a rising star of the basketball team. Jack’s school didn’t even have a basketball team.

When I came to the States for college, the culture shock was dreadful, all the more so because I was neither here nor there, just some waffling half-breed. Around this time, The Streets happened: a quintessential British artist that crossed the pond defiantly himself with apparent success. I’m not an enormous fan of his newer music but this track was comfort food to me when it first came out. Mike Skinner sometimes sounds like a caricature of a British person, or he must do to Americans. But to me, he’s just one of the guys we’d bump into at Buzz Bar who’d chant “Aaaayyyy” and clap if you attempted some bold dance move, then bum you a cigarette or two and probably try to take you home.

And the imagery and tension in the song reminds me of myself and Jack, who were either too young, or too afraid, to celebrate anything other than what we had in common (the radio).

Kid Sister is not a great rapper, or even a good one. She spits out all her words with a nasal, scrunched-up, exaggerated pronunciation, the kind of thing that reminds me of actors in teen movies rapping for laughs.
Pitchfork: Album Reviews: Kid Sister: Ultraviolet
Carrie Brownstein: Aside from putting out good music, what’s the single most effective thing a label can do to get people to buy their music?
Matador: Not sure what the single most efficient thing would be (other than, you know, the Pitchfork 9.1), but getting people excited is never easy to quantify or predict.
Carrie Brownstein: Does a Pitchfork 9.1 help?
Kill Rock Stars: Absolutely.
Matador: Sadly, yes. A Pitchfork 9.1 is more influential to the audience and the retailers than a Rolling Stone or New York Times review.
Carrie Brownstein: What does a Pitchfork 4.5 do?
Kill Rock Stars: A 4.5 can kill a record. Unfortunately.
Merge: Agree on the Pitchfork thing, though I do think that a 9.1 helps more than an average number hurts.
Saddle Creek: I’d be inclined to say a high Pitchfork number helps; a low Pitchfork number is irrelevant.
Matador: There remain great things that aren’t even on the Pitchfork radar.
Merge: Impossible!
Matador: The Beatles.
Secretly Canadian: Cold War Kids were killed on their debut and did quite well.
Matador: Just having a number next to a review discourages anyone from reading.
Merge: Yes, and often the review will be enthusiastic and then the number is like “6.9” and you’re like, “Thanks for nothing.”
Kill Rock Stars: There’s a difference between getting an average/decent review and being a band who is loved by Pitchfork. We have two bands who are doing well despite being basically ignored by Pitchfork right now.
Secretly Canadian: Anything under a 7.6 or 7.7 is a non-review.

Record Labels: “No One Reads Those 6.9 Pitchfork Reviews” | The Measure | The L Magazine - New York City’s Local Event and Arts & Culture Guide

The Pitchfork writers are no less concerned about the purgatory between 5.0 and a 7.9 than anyone else (at least I wasn’t). The number element is a big problem. It turns the whole thing into a record stock market. But what’s the solution?

In the interest of full disclosure: a few seconds of searching turns up the interesting fact that author Chris Milam is also singer-songwriter Chris Milam. Given his stake in the argument, you might wonder what he’s doing to fix the problem. If I might be permitted to pass the same judgment Milam wields: despite his bluster about rawness and hunger in music, Chris Milam the songwriter is pretty bland. The only difference is Milam offers dad-rock, corporate blandness rather than Zach Braff’s slouching indie blandness. Milam actually lists as his influences Tom Petty, Weezer, and the Counting Crows. If that’s his idea of the “other America”, I think I’ll wait here and self-absorbedly finish my latte. But forget pitting culture sponsored by Starbucks versus culture sponsored by EMI-Sony-Universal-Warner. Is there anything more bourgeois than parlor room debates about the authenticity of popular culture? Authenticity is enjoying what you like, with no disclaimer and no apology.

Did Zach Braff Kill American Music? - Idea of the Day Blog - NYTimes.com

This is commenter #11 on this blog post about a PopMatters essay that got a lot of attention and comments a couple of weeks ago. It shuts down the whole discussion forever.

In spoken language I always use “who/whoever” but whenever writing I try to use “whom/whomever.” It always sounds weird to me when spoken… Like the speaker is trying too hard. I’m sure formal situations (like, for example, meeting Her Royal Highness) would require the objective case, but aside from that…
A complete dumbass’s explanation of who vs. whom, found on the Internet, of course. Since when can people just tweak the English language to work for them?

Edward Sharpe & The Magnetic Zeros - “40 Day Dream”

Wow. Just wow. Going to see these guys tomorrow at MHoW.

lemon lips on MySpace Music
Such a rad pic, seemingly by a friend of the musician. Both appear to be teens who still don’t know how great they are, either as photogs or musicians.

lemon lips on MySpace Music

Such a rad pic, seemingly by a friend of the musician. Both appear to be teens who still don’t know how great they are, either as photogs or musicians.


So sweet. So THIS is what it’s like growing up with In The Aeroplane Over The Sea, Decemberists, CYHSY!

Credit to Jason Gross for tweeting about these kids.